Still Hope for Halting Heathcare Entitlement

So now that the Pelosi led Congress has passed H.R. 3590 by hook or crook and behind closed doors and against the will of the American people by the narrowest of margins, it now awaits for President Obama to sign it into law. Fortunately for the American people, the battle for socialized health care is not over.

This little thing called the Constitution may stop Obamacare in its tracks

By Gregory M. Williams

The House has now joined the Senate to pass H.R. 3590, unconstitutional legislation to forcibly impose socialized health care upon the American people against their wishes.  The bill now awaits President Obama’s signature to become law. 

So now that the Pelosi led Congress has passed H.R. 3590 by hook or crook and behind closed doors and against the will of the American people by the narrowest of margins, it now awaits for President Obama to sign it into law.  Fortunately for the American people, the battle for socialized health care is not over. 

As of now, 38 States have signaled their intent to challenge the constitutionality of this soon to be law. Under Article III of the Constitution, when a State(s) sues the Federal Government, it goes straight to the Supreme Court for resolution – ironically by the very Justices who were publically scolded by President Obama in his State of the Union Address earlier this year.

Remember this year’s State of the Union Address when President Obama stood in the well of the House of Representatives and lectured the members of the Supreme Court on their recent decision on Citizens’ United v. Federal Elections Commission which extended First Amendment free speech rights to corporations?  In that speech, President Obama intentionally misrepresented the court’s majority decision which had the appearance of a presidential “smack-down” to the members of the court who were in attendance that evening. After the president admonished the members for their decision, the House and Senate Democrats rose to their feet in unison and applauded in what appeared to be an intentional act at political intimidation by the Legislative Branch toward the Judicial Branch of our government.

Remember, what goes around comes around.

According to many constitutional scholars who have reviewed this soon to be law, it has major constitutional issues which need to be resolved because it potentially violates Article 1: Section 5 (dealing with procedures and Rules of the House and Senate as well as the behavior of individual members) and Section 8 of the Constitution which deals with the 17 enumerated powers of Congress; none of which deals with the establishment of a national health care system. Moreover, there are several provisions in this bill which may violate the fourth, the fifth, the sixth, the seventh and the eighth amendments to the Constitution. And, if that is not enough, the state and/or the people have the exclusive rights under the language of the ninth and tenth amendments of the Constitution to create a health care system and not the federal government.  But, as we have seen during this debate, the Constitution and its restrictions on limited government do not seem to matter to President Obama and the Democrats.
Then there is the “law of unintended consequences” which states that the actions of people, and especially of government, always have effects that are unanticipated or unintended, that could come into play in this debate. 

Should the Supreme Court reassert the original intent of the tenth amendment and rule that H.R. 3590 is unconstitutional, the unintended consequence of such a ruling by the Court could reverse the opinion of their 1941 ruling in United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100, 124 which said in essence the tenth amendment is but a mere “truism” – an opinion which all but ruled that amendment “null and void” and allowed the progressives to build the modern day welfare state we have today.

While the Democrats applauded and rose to their feet as they passed “historic legislation” to reform America’s health care system, the “unintended consequence” of this action could very well lead to the unraveling of the modern day welfare state which the progressives have worked so hard to build over the last 80 to 100 years.  Socialized medicine has always been the goal of the political left and their vehicle for which to “fundamentally transform America.” In the end, wouldn’t it be ironic that the very same vehicle they thought would be the crowning jewel in “transforming America” from a Constitutional Republic to a European-style Socialist Democracy turned out to be the very vehicle which destroys the modern welfare state and restores our system of limited government? 
Now that Congress has passed this legislation over the will of the American people, there are many who believe that President Obama and the Democrats are headed for not only devastating mid-term election defeats this November but a Constitutional “smack-down” as well by the very members of the Court they saw fit to embarrass earlier this year. And this time it will be WE THE PEOPLE who will be applauding.

Gregory Williams recently served as a Senior Policy Advisor under President George W. Bush at the U.S. Department of Energy where he also served as the Director of Intergovernmental Affairs and had extensive experience working with the nation’s Governors and State Legislators on energy issues.  He has also worked on Capital Hill in both the House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate.  He graduated from the University of Florida in 1986 where he majored in Public Relations and Communications. E-mail him at

12 thoughts on “Still Hope for Halting Heathcare Entitlement”

  1. The USA is going to hell in a handbasket because of all the crap politicians keep promising to people with no f**#@% way to pay for it.


  2. The American understanding of ‘Socialised Healthcare’ is very different to that across the rest of the world. Obama and his administration are simply the emperor’s new clothes. Recent linguistic studies – 12 months after his inauguration – show that Obama used no less than 97% Empty Rhetoric in all of his speeches. Bush was a moron, but at least he could be tied to a sentence every now and again! Americans are to blame for what is done to them (by their ‘representatives’) and by them. The present and previous administrations – indeed, the last 20 years or more have been letting them down.


  3. Our problems begin with the fact that many of those referred to as “we the people” cannot distinguish congress’ 17 enumerated powers and their own propensity to innumerate.


  4. I am sick of this so called President and his lies how long before some one takes him out they will be the nations hero and savior


  5. I hope the Supreme court does put an end to this madness, not because they are retaliating at Obama’s stupid remarks about the Court in his State of the Union address, but because this is just pain wrong.


  6. EKK

    No, I do not believe the Court would do such thing. The point of my article was once the Court review’s this new law and see how many times it runs a foul of the Constitution, it will see like a “Judicial Smackdown” by the Court. But maybe, that is what President Obama wants as he needs a villian to run against in his 2012 re-election campaing.


  7. If the Supreme Court of the United States rules the Healthcare Law is unconstitutional, I can hear Obama, Reid, & Pelosi saying “John [Roberts] has made his decision; let him enforce it now if he can.”
    (Apologies to Andrew Jackson)


  8. Susan

    I am for pro-health care reform to … but not this version. This is anything but reform of our nation’s health care system. It is a major push to turn America into a European Style Socialst Democracy.

    The main things that would have made health care more affordable and available to most ( lifting the federal prohibition against selling and buying health insurance across state lines isn’t in the bill; also, Parent’s of children who have pre-existing condition are still unable to purchase health care. As time goes buy, more and more about the truth of this bill comes out … like money is in the bill for sex offenders to get viagara.

    This bill was passed under the guise of health care reform and it is anything but. Please open you eyes and educate youself about what is really in this bill. By the way, did you ever ask yourself this question: “If this is a health care bill, then why is there a provision to nationalize the student loan industry?”

    This is about the government controling the masses by the few. Congressman Dingell (D-MI) said it best, it is about “controlling the people” – scary words in a nation that is suppose to be a nation of WE THE PEOPLE!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s