Loyalty important to RPOF, albeit selectively

Loyalty – most people know the meaning of the word and are taught the value of the word from their childhood years. The Merriam-Webster dictionary definition is very simple in stating that being loyal is being, “unswerving in allegiance.”

Oath enforcement to apply to Crist — but not Thrasher

By Scott Factor

Loyalty – most people know the meaning of the word and are taught the value of the word from their childhood years. The Merriam-Webster dictionary definition is very simple in stating that being loyal is being, “unswerving in allegiance.” Most people expect loyalty from their family, their friends, their spouse, and those that they elect and trust to represent them before the very government that will serve them.  

The Florida Republican Party is no different in its expectations of its members, both elected and appointed.  From the grassroots level precinct committee person to the governor of Florida, those appointed or elected to office as a member of the Republican Party are required to sign a loyalty oath that states they “will not actively, publicly, or financially support the election of any candidate other than the Republican Candidate” in a partisan election.

So it comes as no surprise to most that the party sent out a memo Thursday in which the party’s general counsel stated that because party officials signed an oath to support Republicans, they would be obligated to oppose Charlie Crist’s possible unaffiliated campaign and should ask for any donations to be refunded.

The memo, written by Jason Gonzalez, former general council to Crist, said, “Any member who fails to formally revoke his or her public support and request the return of any contributions made to a candidate running against the candidate of the Republican Party would be in violation of the RPOF Rules and would be subject to removal from party office and membership on Republican executive committees.”

In terms of loyalty to the party, if you signed a loyalty oath then you should be expected to comply with this simple reminder. As a party person, you should not be offended by this memo; rather, you should welcome it as a friendly reminder of your personal commitments.

So, why are some people upset by this memo?  Well, for one thing, Crist has not announced that he’s running as an independent and technically he’s still running as a Republican. Crist himself stated that the memo was, “premature.”  However, state Senator Mike Fasano was angry because, well….because he was being asked to be loyal to the oath he signed?  It’s not clear. Fasano was quoted by the St. Petersburg Times as saying, “How dare anyone at the state party tell us who we can and cannot support…..I was walking precincts and making phone calls as a volunteer for Republican candidates when leaders of today’s GOP establishment were registered Democrats.” Fasano seems to remember his early political days, but I guess he forgot about that oath he signed. 

It seems someone else forgot about the concept of loyalty, also. When Alex Sink was running for re-election for the office of CFO of Florida, current party Chairman John Thrasher wrote her campaign a check for the maximum allowable personal contribution of $500….but we won’t mention that because, well, because he’s the leader, and certainly not a hyporcrit.

Ironically enough,  Fasano had more to say about that memo in the Times, blasting it with, “It’s because of this type of bullying and threatening tactics that encouraged so many Floridians to distance themselves from the two parties.” 

To that I say this:  I’ve had friends I would consider bullies. Sometimes they were good to have in your corner, especially when times got tough. Sometimes tough times call for tough measures and tough friends. Sometimes friends are too tough. But no matter the shortcomings or strengths of friends, I don’t think any of us would want friends that are not loyal. So while Fasano demonstrates a loyalty to Crist that only true love could explain, his loyalty to the party with whom he took an oath to be loyal is, well, non-existent.  And while the party demonstrates a loyalty to it’s oath that only a lawyer could explain, it’s very leader writes checks demonstrating his own loyalties lie with his political ambitions, not his party.

Mr. Fasano, if you’re really concerned about people distancing themselves from the Republican Party, maybe you should lead by example and show us what loyalty is all about, absent your underlying true feelings toward someone.  If the party is really interested in loyalty, maybe they should have chosen a different leader. And if people are really interested in loyalty, maybe they should not pay any attention to politicians. 

Currently living in Florida, Scott is a graduate of Eckerd College in St. Petersburg, FL and earned his M.B.A. at St. Leo University. He writes conservative rants focusing on the national political landscape. E-mail him at: scott.factor@yahoo.com.

4 thoughts on “Loyalty important to RPOF, albeit selectively”

  1. Hmm! Thrasher has his own set of rules. When I signed that oath to be a member of the GOP executive party in Hillsborough County, I saw it as binding as the one I took while serving in the military for 31 years. It was tough for me, too, since one of my combat friends was running for a Congressional seat as a Democrat in Ohio. I truly wanted to donate to his campaign but the oath I took overcame a friendship bond developed under the worst of conditions.
    Senator Thrasher deserves to be slapped for this as should be Senator Fasano for his comments. The problem is these people think the rules aren’t for them, and that’s why we keep getting ridiculous legislation from Tallahassee.

    Like

  2. “The problem is these people think the rules aren’t for them, and that’s why we keep getting ridiculous legislation from Tallahassee.”

    Let’s not leave out Washington D.C., Scoop!

    Like

  3. Hi Chris,

    I watched your interview and I am commenting on it here because I didn’t see any other place I could.

    You mentioned in the interview that you are a “life-long Republican” but I don’t believe you had one kind word to say about the party, nor one word of criticism about the Democrats. I understand that yiu were responding to questions and I suppose you had no control over the topics, but you are certainly sharp enough to answer the question and then segue to a fair criticism of the Democrats. For example, at the end of the interview, you were asked about Kendrick Meek’s chances, and you pointed out that they might be good under certain circumstances, but it was an easy opening for you to point out why he shouldn’t be elected.

    Chris, we don’t know each other well, but I think we have a lot in common where politics is concerned. Neither of us is a rabid partisan and we expect much better from our own party than we’ve been getting. They piss me off too but with our two-party system, one is forced to move all in with one party or the other, or have minmal impact over events. This upcomingg midterm election is one of the most critical in our lifetime. We need to set aside our intra-party disputes and focus on defeating Obama’s agenda. There is only one way to do that and that is by electing Republicans. At this point, I would readily vote for a crooked Republican over any Democrat as long as I was satisfied that he would not support any of Obama’s agenda.

    Come on, Chris, you’re a very smart man with a lot of knowledge about politics and winning elections. We need you squarely back on our side and attacking our political foes.

    All the best.

    Jonathan

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s